top of page

Nominalized Clauses inside Noun Phrases

B2

Clauses

1. Function


Nominalized clauses inside noun phrases allow Turkish to compress actions, processes, and outcomes into compact noun units.


When an action enters a noun phrase, the structure shifts from a static label to a process-bearing unit, enabling dense information packaging in everyday speech, professional writing, and academic analysis.


2. Forms


A) Action Nominalization with –mA


Form:
Verb + (Voice) + -mA + Possessive


This structure turns an action into a noun that can function as the possessed element in a noun phrase.


Examples:

  • strateji planlama-sı

  • veri analiz yapıl-ma-sı


The possessive suffix is obligatory and signals nominal status.


B) Possessive-Based Modifiers with –DIK / –(y)AcAK

Relative nominalizations behave like possessive-based modifiers, not simple adjectives.


Form:
Owner (Genitive) + Verb-DIK / -(y)AcAK + Possessive


Example:

  • hükümet-in al-dığ-ı kararlar


This structure refers to the outcome of an action, not to a descriptive quality.


3. Morphology


A) Possessive Control

Nominalized verbs must carry a possessive suffix to enter noun phrases.
Without possessive marking, the structure is incomplete.


B) Pronominal –n– (Structural Joint)

The pronominal -n- is not a simple buffer consonant.
It is a structural joint that connects possessive-marked units to case markers.

It appears after possessive suffixes and before any case marker, regardless of whether the case suffix begins with a vowel or a consonant.


Examples:

  • planlama-sı-n-dan

  • politika-sı-n-da

  • yapıl-ma-sı-n


C) Negative Nominalization with –mAmA

Negative processes are most naturally expressed through double nominalization, not through –sIz.


Examples:

  • proje-nin onaylan-ma-ma-sı

  • veri-ler-in paylaşıl-ma-ma-sı


These forms encode the absence of an action as a process and integrate smoothly into noun phrase structures.


4. Structural Guide


A) Chain Integration with Nominalized Actions

Nominalized clauses can occupy the final position in complex possessive chains.


Natural structure:

  • evin tadilatının yapılmasını bekliyoruz


Hierarchical analysis:

  • ev-in (Owner)

  • tadilat-ı (Owned 1)

  • -n-ın (Genitive bridge)

  • yapıl-ma-sı-n-ı (Final owned action, Accusative)


Micro-morphology of yapılmasını:

  • yap- (verb root)

  • -ıl- (passive)

  • -ma- (nominalizer)

  • -sı (possessive)

  • -n- (pronominal joint)

  • (accusative / specific object marker)


B) Visual Hierarchy (Matruşka Logic)

Meaning is decoded from right to left, while modification accumulates from left to right.


Example:

  • [[şirket-in uyguladığ-ı] sistem]-in sonuçları


The inner unit must be interpreted as a complete block before attaching to the outer noun.


5. Usage

Nominalized clauses inside noun phrases are used to:


  • Report processes without full subordinate clauses

  • Maintain formal or neutral tone

  • Organize complex information efficiently

  • Reflect both spoken reasoning and written analysis


These structures are common in professional language and everyday explanations alike.

Examples


A) Everyday Use


Natural Form:

  • Ödeme yapılmasını bekliyoruz.


Morphological Form:

  • ödeme yapıl-ma-sı-n-ı bekliyor-uz


English:

  • We are waiting for the payment to be made.



B) Professional Context


Natural Form:

  • Projenin onaylanmaması süreci uzattı.


Morphological Form:

  • proje-nin onaylan-ma-ma-sı süreç-i uzat-tı


English:

  • The non-approval of the project prolonged the process.


C) Advanced B2+ Stacking


Natural Form:

  • Stratejik hedeflerin belirlenmesinin önemi büyüktür.


Morphological Form:

  • stratejik hedef-ler-in belir-le-n-me-si-n-in önem-i büyük-tür


Micro-morphology of belirlenmesinin:

  • belir- (root)

  • -le- (verb-making)

  • -n- (passive)

  • -me- (nominalizer)

  • -si (possessive)

  • -n- (pronominal joint)

  • -in (genitive)


English:

  • The importance of the setting of strategic goals.

Notes

  • The -mAk infinitive cannot take possessive suffixes and therefore cannot participate in possessive noun phrase chains.

  • Only -mA nominalizations function as fully integrated noun phrase elements.

  • The pronominal -n- is mandatory wherever possessive morphology meets case marking.

Nominalized Clauses inside Noun Phrases – FAQ (B2)


Q: Why are nominalized clauses used inside noun phrases in Turkish?
A: They allow actions, processes, and outcomes to be packaged as noun units. This makes sentences denser, more formal, and suitable for analytical or explanatory contexts.


Q: Why is the possessive suffix mandatory in –mA nominalizations?
A: The possessive suffix signals that the verb form has fully entered the noun phrase system. Without it, the nominalized clause cannot function as a possessed noun.


Q: Why is –mAk not used inside possessive noun phrase chains?
A: The –mAk infinitive cannot take possessive suffixes. Only –mA nominalizations can integrate into possessive chains and carry case marking.

bottom of page